To:
ietf-provreg@cafax.se
From:
"Liu, Hong" <Hong.Liu@neustar.biz>
Date:
Mon, 5 Aug 2002 15:46:40 -0400
Sender:
owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Subject:
RE: Login Failure and Sessions
Scott, Now I understand what your problem was, -:) Yes, I was referring to option 2 with N to be determined by the server operator. --Hong -----Original Message----- From: Hollenbeck, Scott [mailto:shollenbeck@verisign.com] Sent: Monday, August 05, 2002 3:41 PM To: 'Liu, Hong'; ietf-provreg@cafax.se Subject: RE: Login Failure and Sessions > I understand your concerns, but the retrial number N is really a > configuration parameter. It is not unusual to leave this type > of parameters > for run-time configuration, take the windowing protocol as an > example. The > size of the window is not fixed in the spec. You didn't address the problem I presented: the need to craft a deterministic state diagram. If what you're saying, though, is that you prefer option 2 (blast the connection after N failures) with the value of N (0 <= N <= inf) to be determined by the server operator, I can work with that. That's at least easier to describe formally than "it's a policy issue". ;-) -Scott-