To:
"'Rick H Wesson'" <wessorh@ar.com>
Cc:
"'ietf-provreg@cafax.se'" <ietf-provreg@cafax.se>
From:
"Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com>
Date:
Mon, 14 Jan 2002 12:37:31 -0500
Sender:
owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Subject:
RE: <info> Command and authInfo
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rick H Wesson [mailto:wessorh@ar.com]
> Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 12:24 PM
> To: Hollenbeck, Scott
> Cc: 'ietf-provreg@cafax.se'
> Subject: Re: <info> Command and authInfo
>
>
>
> please don't turn this spec into VeriSigns view of a Domain Registry. Up
> till now you have done a good job of engineering but it seems as though
> your employer is creeping into your work.
Rick, I really object to any insinuation that there's any employer bias
creeping into anything here. My comments on RRP were provided to document
experience with a similar protocol. Data mining is a real issue, and the
current EPP spec has said for a LONG time about the way the info command
should be implemented -- and it's NOT what you suggested ("the status
command should be open to all registrars"). Instead of an ad-hominem
attack, why not address the data mining risk and merit or detriment of the
change proposal?
-Scott-