To:
ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Cc:
lewis@tislabs.com, jaap@sidn.nl
From:
Edward Lewis <lewis@tislabs.com>
Date:
Wed, 7 Nov 2001 14:00:31 -0500
Sender:
owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Subject:
pre-agenda for SLC
A month from now we will have the Salt Lake City meetings. We'll have one
multicasted hour.
Here is what I hope to cover (as a first cut):
1) Status (document traffic)
2) What do we need before sending EPP(*) to the IESG?
a) Implementation reports
b) Identification/not-discussion of issues
3) Perhaps an issue discussion
4) Other document progress
I've been debating discussing "Future Directions" but I think that it would
be premature, so I want to refrain from that at SLC. (IOW - don't suggest
it!)
Oh, the '*': the set of documents that seems to be prudent to progess are
in two groups:
#2-5 and #6, referring to this numbering. I want to start to progress all
5, but I am shying away from formally tying the TCP transport to the core
documents - just for "show." I don't want to detract from the effort to
develop #7.
>1) The requirements
>2) EPP base
>3) EPP domain mapping
>4) EPP host mapping
>5) EPP contact mapping
>6) EPP over TCP
>7) EPP over BEEP
>8) Containers in EPP
>9) Definitions
Some of the issues behind progressing the documents. First, the IESG still
hasn't commented on the updated requirements. Second, we will have a WG
last call when appropriate. Third, I want to get some implementation
reports to give more creedence to the completeness of the drafts. Note -
documents can progress to some levels of standards without implementations,
so the third point is not a necessary condition. Also, the appropriate
time to go to last call may be before SLC, during, or after.
BTW - Jaap and I will be at the Marina del Ray ICANN meeting next week.
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Edward Lewis NAI Labs
Phone: +1 443-259-2352 Email: lewis@tislabs.com
You fly too often when ... the airport taxi is on speed-dial.
Opinions expressed are property of my evil twin, not my employer.