To:
Bill Manning <bmanning@isi.edu>
Cc:
"Brian W. Spolarich" <briansp@walid.com>, Patrik Faltstrom <paf@cisco.com>, Hollenbeck Scott <shollenbeck@verisign.com>, ietf-provreg@cafax.se
From:
George Belotsky <george@register.com>
Date:
Thu, 8 Mar 2001 14:44:33 -0500
Content-Disposition:
inline
In-Reply-To:
<200103081900.f28J0DN02549@zed.isi.edu>; from bmanning@ISI.EDU on Thu, Mar 08, 2001 at 11:00:13AM -0800
Sender:
owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
User-Agent:
Mutt/1.2.5i
Subject:
Re: Unique handle generation
With something like 'WM-9387-19790922:09:27:33' we are back
to handles that are hard to remember.
In previous posts, complaints were raised about this issue.
If readability is not a problem, existing UUID algorithms will ensure
uniqueness.
From previous discussion, I have identified three properties of handles
that people seemed to find desireable (listed again below).
(i) Handles should be easy to remember/readable;
(ii) Handles should identify objects uniquely;
(iii) It's probably a bad idea for the handles to change.
Does everyone agree with the above list?
George.
On Thu, Mar 08, 2001 at 11:00:13AM -0800, Bill Manning wrote:
> %
> % > I like the idea of a timestamp, but I don't want to remember it
> % > as part of my handle.
> %
> % Hi. I'm "Brian W. Spolarich-RIPE-984076683".
> %
> % Ick. :-)
> %
> % -bws
>
>
> Well... the American Registry for Internet Numbers got ARIN.
> Does that mean the Argentian Registry for Internet Numbers gets ARIN2 ?
>
> Under the new RIR structure, I am assigned WM110-<rir-handle>
> Under the old, single IR structure, I was assigned WM110.
> Under the earlier IR structure, I was assigned WMAN
>
> A couple of problems.
> There is a problem with internal vs external tagging. e.g.
> the registrar should not expose their internal tagging of client
> handles.
> Then there is the debate on dealing w/ duplicates. The approch
> currently in use is to assign a monotonically increasing number
> to initals. Patrik has refined this to using a timestamp.
> (warning... curveball ahead...:)
> And then there is the use of initals. Not everyone uses ASCII.
> How will "handles" support non-ASCII character representations?
>
> Endgame... I think I should be able to select the "seed" be which
> my Internet-wide, unique handle is created. My seed is used to
> generate a unique handle that has at least two other, non-Internet
> related "salts". So my handle might be:
>
> WM-9387-19790922:09:27:33
>
> My initals, the last four characters of my national
> registration card, and the date/time stamp I first logged ito
> an IP-supporting node.
>
> ARINs could be:
>
> ARIN-8866-19970110
>
> Their initals, the last four characters of their TaxID,
> and the date of first operation.
>
> YMMV...
>
>
> --
> --bill
--
-----------------------------
George Belotsky
Senior Software Architect
Register.com, inc.
george@register.com
212-798-9127 (phone)
212-798-9876 (fax)