To:
shollenbeck@verisign.com (Hollenbeck, Scott)
Cc:
bmanning@isi.edu ('Bill Manning'), ietf-provreg@cafax.se
From:
Bill Manning <bmanning@isi.edu>
Date:
Mon, 19 Feb 2001 08:46:11 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To:
<DF737E620579D411A8E400D0B77E671D75064C@regdom-ex01.prod.netsol.com> from "Hollenbeck, Scott" at Feb 16, 2001 10:32:06 AM
Sender:
owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Subject:
Re: grrp-reqs-06, 11. Security Considerations [3]
Yup. I re-read it.
I'm concerned that depending on venue, the level of information
required changes. DNS baseline vs DNS-TSIG, vs DNS-SIG/KEY
not counting the goofy CERT rr injections for PGP/SSH key distribution
will all change the amount of data that will need to be maintained.
%
% Bill,
%
% Have a read of the definitions section ("Thick Registry" specifically),
% where it describes "technical information" as "information needed to produce
% zone files".
%
% <Scott/>
%
% -----Original Message-----
% From: Bill Manning [mailto:bmanning@ISI.EDU]
% Sent: Friday, February 16, 2001 10:27 AM
% To: shollenbeck@verisign.com
% Cc: ietf-provreg@cafax.se
% Subject: Re: grrp-reqs-06, 11. Security Considerations [3]
%
%
% %
% % Eric,
% %
% % The intention of requirement 11-[3] isn't to document that "a mechanism
% % exists to to distinguish technical from social information", it's intended
% % to note that disclosure of non-technical information may be subject to
% % restrictions and the protocol needs to provide a way to identify
% information
% % that is subject to disclosure restrictions. This was added at the request
% % of Karl Auerbach.
%
% What is the distinction between "technical" and "non-technical"?
% Are these definitions immutatble within/between juristictions?
% Will they withstand legal review?
% In which venues?
%
% --bill
%
--
--bill