To:
ietf-provreg@cafax.se
From:
"Jörg Bauer/Denic" <bauer@denic.de>
Date:
Thu, 1 Feb 2001 10:33:03 +0100
Sender:
owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Subject:
Antwort: Unique handle (was RE: Merging RRP and Whois)
On 01.02.2001 00:07 budi@alliance.globalnetlink.com wrote:
>
> > Dumb question: Instead of inventing new identifiers or bending
> > existing ones in perhaps ungraceful ways, why not use a URL as the
> > identifier?
>
> As with email, I've had URL which is not active anymore.
> (Actually, it is now owned by somebody else!)
> How do you authenticate the owner of a URL?
> I have a domain (thus the URL) that does not belong to me
> anymore.
What do you thinks of URN´s (not yet a full standart, as far as i know)
something like
urn:registry:whois.denic.de:person:joerg_bauer
with the following meenings:
urn:registry: Namespace for registries
whois.denic.de: Whois information to the object
person: type of object
joerg_bauer: identifier inside the registry
I know that with this approach i´m again mixing rrp and whois.
Maybe it is an better idea to say rrp.denic.de for an interface to rrp.
--
----------------------------------+-------------------------------------------
Joerg Bauer | eMail : Joerg.Bauer@denic.de
DENIC eG | Fon : +49 69 272 35 180
Wiesenhuettenplatz 26 | Fax : +49 69 27235 235
D-60329 Frankfurt |
----------------------------------+-------------------------------------------