To:
Roy Arends <roy@dnss.ec>
cc:
dnssec@cafax.se
From:
Paul Wouters <paul@xelerance.com>
Date:
Tue, 22 Jun 2004 11:33:35 +0200 (MET DST)
In-Reply-To:
<Pine.BSO.4.56.0406211945150.31719@trinitario.schlyter.se>
Sender:
owner-dnssec@cafax.se
Subject:
Re: continued: rrsig(qtype)
On Mon, 21 Jun 2004, Roy Arends wrote: > On Mon, 21 Jun 2004, Derek Atkins wrote: > > > I don't think Paul has been reading namedroppers. I think Indeed. I was not aware of some of the previous issues discussed there. Sorry about that. > > over there before re-responding to issues that have already > > been discussed there.. > > Ah, okay. > > Paul, the chairs of the DNSEXT wg declared a radio silence on namedroppers > with regards to everything that is likely to be an alternative to the > current NSEC definition in the DNSSEC-bis documents. This radio silence > has been declared so that the primary focus of the WG can be: advancing > the internet-drafts to IESG to become RFC's. Ah okay. In that case I misunderstood the context. In fact, the above paragraph is very good news to me. And most of my remarks earlier have become irrelevant. > I hope this helps in clarifying what this is about, and my apologies to > the list (and Paul ofcourse) for dumping this proposal on dnssec@cafax > without prior notice. I hope discussion on rrsig(qtype) continues. Thanks > derek for the notice ! It did. Thanks for the long explanation with the references. I'll try and catch up again. Paul