To:
Paul Wouters <paul@xelerance.com>
Cc:
dnssec@cafax.se
From:
David Blacka <davidb@verisignlabs.com>
Date:
Mon, 21 Jun 2004 11:21:48 -0400
Content-Disposition:
inline
In-Reply-To:
<Pine.LNX.4.44.0406211541300.5274-100000@expansionpack.xtdnet.nl>
Sender:
owner-dnssec@cafax.se
User-Agent:
KMail/1.6.2
Subject:
Re: continued: rrsig(qtype)
On Monday 21 June 2004 10:14 am, Paul Wouters wrote: > > Yes, due to client/server inbalance there is a higher load on server > > resources compared to clients, then with DNSSEC-bis. > > And the only reason for this is the supposed secret/patent/trademark state > of the .com zone? I wish the CC:TLD's would just go on without Verisign. This has *nothing* to do with VeriSign. The .com zone is not "secret", you can download it if you wish. The issue of zone enumeration was brought up because of concerns by CC:TLD operators, not VeriSign. -- David Blacka <davidb@verisignlabs.com> Sr. Engineer VeriSign Applied Research