[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


To: dnssec@cafax.se
From: Peter Koch <pk@TechFak.Uni-Bielefeld.DE>
Date: Thu, 13 May 2004 18:37:02 +0200
Content-ID: <14277.1084466222.1@grimsvotn.TechFak.Uni-Bielefeld.DE>
In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 13 May 2004 17:02:25 +0200." <200405131502.i4DF2PD9010791@omval.tednet.nl>
Sender: owner-dnssec@cafax.se
Subject: Re: dnssec: resolver - application communication

Ted.Lindgreen@tednet.nl wrote:

> Hmm, adapting the protocol to help stubresolvers to distinguish
> between errortypes in corner cases (that IS what is going on here:
> you are assuming a corner case AND some other error simultaneously)
> does not seem the right way to me.

sorry for being unclear. I was trying to say that if you have SERVFAIL+answer
you can't differentiate between "NOTVAL" and "corner case", (i.e. timeout
problems etc). They do not have to be present both at the same time.

-Peter

Home | Date list | Subject list