[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


To: dnssec@cafax.se
From: Rob Austein <sra@hactrn.net>
Date: Mon, 10 May 2004 13:57:21 -0400
In-Reply-To: <200405101041.53316.davidb@verisignlabs.com>
Sender: owner-dnssec@cafax.se
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.10.1 (Watching The Wheels) Emacs/21.3 Mule/5.0 (SAKAKI)
Subject: Re: dnssec: resolver - application communication

At Mon, 10 May 2004 10:41:53 -0400, David Blacka wrote:
> 
> On Monday 10 May 2004 9:23 am, Miek Gieben wrote:
> >...
> > This essentially leads to the case whereby every application will do it's
> > own validation. When you are validating DNSSEC data, it is very handy to
> > directly talk to the authoritative server. Thus this, in turn, will lead to
> > increased pounding on the authoritative servers on the Internet. Most
> > notably the secure entry points, which will be root in some future. In
> > short: this will most probably break the DNS.
> 
> I'm not sure I agree here.  Why would validating stub resolvers (a term I'm 
> using for the "application") wish to talk directly to the authoritative 
> servers?

In particular, what does the validating stub resolver need from the
authoritative name servers that it can't get via recursive name
servers by setting the CD bit?


Home | Date list | Subject list