To:
paul@vix.com (Paul Vixie)
Cc:
namedroppers@ops.ietf.org, dnssec@cafax.se
From:
Bill Manning <bmanning@isi.edu>
Date:
Tue, 17 Sep 2002 10:54:52 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To:
<20020917173031.6A75228B01@as.vix.com> from Paul Vixie at "Sep 17, 2 05:30:31 pm"
Sender:
owner-dnssec@cafax.se
Subject:
Re: DS and the deployed base
% > So, my problem appears to be a bug when querying the Root with a bind % > 9.2.1 Recursive DNS Server. % > % > I now upgraded to 9.3.0s20020722 and I get the proper answers: % > % > Does this indicate that the "flag-day" may have much % > broader impact that one might have originally thought? % % according to published reports, bind8 is the most popular dns implementation % now in use, followed by bind4, followed by microsoft. the fact that an % interrim bind9 release didn't handle NXT RR's correctly is of very little % significance, since people who run bind9 at all are very susceptible to % upgrading it when they hear that a new release is available. % % now, if you've got data concerning bad behaviour from bind8, bind4, or % microsoft, then we should be considering that in light of flag days et al. % % -- % to unsubscribe send a message to namedroppers-request@ops.ietf.org with % the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body. % archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/namedroppers/> % Investigating. --bill