To:
David Conrad <david.conrad@nominum.com>
Cc:
Daniel Senie <dts@senie.com>, Brad Knowles <brad.knowles@skynet.be>, dnsop@cafax.se
From:
Brad Knowles <brad.knowles@skynet.be>
Date:
Wed, 30 Apr 2003 13:12:33 +0200
In-Reply-To:
<49EAC910-7AAF-11D7-B0B2-000393DB42B2@nominum.com>
Sender:
owner-dnsop@cafax.se
Subject:
Re: draft-ietf-dnsop-serverid-01.txt
At 6:58 PM -0700 2003/04/29, David Conrad wrote:
> In the meantime, given a server returning bogus information is most
> likely unrelated to routing instability which is where the CH class
> ID.SERVER hack wouldn't work, wouldn't it be nice to have an imperfect
> way of handling the vast majority of cases?
Having ID.SERVER is certainly an improvement over what we have
now, which is nothing. I think we can worry about the other issues
separately.
--
Brad Knowles, <brad.knowles@skynet.be>
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
-Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania.
GCS/IT d+(-) s:+(++)>: a C++(+++)$ UMBSHI++++$ P+>++ L+ !E-(---) W+++(--) N+
!w--- O- M++ V PS++(+++) PE- Y+(++) PGP>+++ t+(+++) 5++(+++) X++(+++) R+(+++)
tv+(+++) b+(++++) DI+(++++) D+(++) G+(++++) e++>++++ h--- r---(+++)* z(+++)
#----------------------------------------------------------------------
# To unsubscribe, send a message to <dnsop-request@cafax.se>.