To:
itojun@iijlab.net
cc:
Aidan Williams <aidan.williams@motorola.com>, "Steven M. Bellovin" <smb@research.att.com>, ipng@sunroof.eng.sun.com, DNSOP WG <dnsop@cafax.se>
From:
Robert Elz <kre@munnari.OZ.AU>
Date:
Tue, 26 Nov 2002 19:12:51 +1100
In-Reply-To:
<20021126053039.353094B22@coconut.itojun.org>
Sender:
owner-dnsop@cafax.se
Subject:
Re: short circuiting reverse lookups
Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 14:30:39 +0900
From: itojun@iijlab.net
Message-ID: <20021126053039.353094B22@coconut.itojun.org>
| it will screw up people who plans to use site-locals in two-faced DNS,
| though...
That would be no problem at all, anyone who wants to use two faced DNS
deserves whatever evil befalls them.
The real problem with never doing reverse lookups on site or link locals
(assuming that there is a need to do reverse lookups at all, for
anything) is for sites that are disconnected, where site locals, or
even link locals, are all the addresses that exist.
kre
#----------------------------------------------------------------------
# To unsubscribe, send a message to <dnsop-request@cafax.se>.