To:
pekkas@netcore.fi (Pekka Savola)
Cc:
bmanning@karoshi.com, brad.knowles@skynet.be (Brad Knowles), itojun@itojun.org (Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino), Mohsen.Souissi@nic.fr, dnsop@cafax.se, ngtrans@sunroof.eng.sun.com
From:
bmanning@karoshi.com
Date:
Mon, 15 Jul 2002 07:08:12 +0000 (UCT)
In-Reply-To:
<Pine.LNX.4.44.0207150950460.32571-100000@netcore.fi> from "Pekka Savola" at Jul 15, 2002 09:53:44 AM
Sender:
owner-dnsop@cafax.se
Subject:
Re: RFC 1886 Interop Tests & Results
Bing! Relevent section. Nothing in ip6.arpa
unless managed by the RIRs. 3ffe not managed
by RIRs, no ip6.arpa, 2002 not managed by RIRs,
no ip6.arpa..... :)
Prudent apps writers might want to see what is
actually, operationaly deployed before
truncating working delegations. ... YMMV
>
> On Mon, 15 Jul 2002 bmanning@karoshi.com wrote:
> > > I seem to recall there was some Best Current Practises about this 11
> > > months ago.
> > >
> >
> > ip6.arpa is fine for 2001:0:: but not for -anythhing-
> > else. You might want to re-read the BCP. :)
>
> You're probably referring to the IANA considerations:
>
> --8<--
> 3. IANA Considerations
>
> This memo requests that the IANA delegate the IP6.ARPA domain
> following instructions to be provided by the IAB. Names within this
> zone are to be further delegated to the regional IP registries in
> accordance with the delegation of IPv6 address space to those
> registries. The names allocated should be hierarchic in accordance
> with the address space assignment.
> --8<--
>
> Nothing else seems to match. The second sentence is probably relevant
> here.
>
> How should an application writer know there are hidden messages in the BCP
> ("don't delegate to 6bone, make ip6.arpa useless")?
>
> As 6bone have been delegated IPv6 address space, I think this could very
> well be interpreted to include them too.
>
> --
> Pekka Savola "Tell me of difficulties surmounted,
> Netcore Oy not those you stumble over and fall"
> Systems. Networks. Security. -- Robert Jordan: A Crown of Swords
>