To:
David Terrell <dbt@meat.net>
Cc:
Greg Hudson <ghudson@MIT.EDU>, keydist@cafax.se, smb@research.att.com, jis@MIT.EDU
From:
Richard Shockey <rich.shockey@NeuStar.com>
Date:
Fri, 04 Oct 2002 12:43:30 -0400
In-Reply-To:
<20021004032549.GC17768@pianosa.catch22.org>
Sender:
owner-keydist@cafax.se
Subject:
Re: I intend to have a document ready for Atlanta on this subject.
A > > There may be one key derived from mailto:richard@shockey.us and another > > from sip:richard@shockey.us . The opportunistic PKI infrastructure must be > > flexible enough to accommodate both and NAPTR records do that by allowing > > the ABNF syntax for the NAPTR service field to be defined by and listing > > the application protocol the application supports. > > as an example.. > >Ugh, NAPTR. > >an Email signature key for richard@shockey.us would be a different >keytype from SIP, they would be used in different contexts. SIP is >a pretty good candidate for using IPsec, yes but some folks are also interested in encrypting the RTP stream as well. >for example, whereas email >isn't because it does through so many intermediate systems. Email >key types already exist (PGP, SMIME), so shoehorning them into >the same RDATA format with HTTPS keys seems no good. > >-- >David Terrell | "We must go forward, not backwards; upwards, >Nebcorp Prime Minister | not forwards; and always twirling, twirling, >dbt@meat.net | twirling towards freedom!" >http://wwn.nebcorp.com/ | - The Simpsons >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Richard Shockey, Senior Manager, Strategic Technology Initiatives NeuStar Inc. 46000 Center Oak Plaza - Sterling, VA 20166 Voice +1 571.434.5651 Cell : +1 314.503.0640, Fax: +1 815.333.1237 <mailto:richard@shockey.us> or <mailto:richard.shockey@neustar.biz> <http://www.neustar.biz> ; <http://www.enum.org> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<