[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


To: Walt Howard <howard@eng.utah.edu>
cc: keydist@cafax.se
From: Simon Josefsson <simon+keydist@josefsson.org>
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2002 12:02:41 +0200 (CEST)
In-Reply-To: <200204151939.NAA29707@lab1-36.eng.utah.edu>
Sender: owner-keydist@cafax.se
Subject: Re: Let's assume DNS is involved

On Mon, 15 Apr 2002, Walt Howard wrote:

> I agree with Jakob's point that we should try to keep the size of the
> RRset associated with a hostname small. That will almost certainly
> require that the rather large APPKEY/CERT RRs be detached from the
> host's RRset.

This makes no sense to me.  What do you mean by a "host's RRset"?  The
host's IN A RRset? APPKEY/CERT IN RRs are separated from a host's IN A
RRset.  Any number of IN APPKEY/CERT RRs attached to a domain name does
not affect the size of an IN A query for that domain name.

All of these issues would be removed if each application used its own RR.  
I am beginning to like that approach more and more..  There is plenty of
RR space available.


Home | Date list | Subject list