[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


To: Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ottawa.on.ca>
CC: keydist@cafax.se
From: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@baltimore.ie>
Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2002 15:02:43 +0100
Reply-To: stephen.farrell@baltimore.ie
Sender: owner-keydist@cafax.se
Subject: Re: Let's assume DNS is involved


> a) There is no certification authority which signs keys for where the name
>    is an IP address.

That's a bit misleading. If you mean you don't know what deployed CA does
this, then fair enough. If you mean that new certificate-like formats are 
required to do it, then you're wrong - just use a null-DN in the subject 
field and an altname with an ip address and X.509's fine.

And I think the latter is more relevant for an answer to the (IMO
quite good) question posed.

Stephen.


-- 
____________________________________________________________
Stephen Farrell         				   
Baltimore Technologies,   tel: (direct line) +353 1 881 6716
39 Parkgate Street,                     fax: +353 1 881 7000
Dublin 8.                mailto:stephen.farrell@baltimore.ie
Ireland                             http://www.baltimore.com

Home | Date list | Subject list