To:
keydist@cafax.se
From:
Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ottawa.on.ca>
Date:
Tue, 08 Jan 2002 12:57:44 -0500
In-reply-to:
Your message of "Mon, 07 Jan 2002 13:23:23 PST." <p05101010b85fc1aa6d91@[165.227.249.20]>
Sender:
owner-keydist@cafax.se
Subject:
Re: Definitions of keys and certs
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >>>>> "IMC" == IMC <Paul> writes: IMC> Let's toss a bit more fat on the fire here. Some people have been IMC> claiming that they only care about bare public keys; I disagree with IMC> a subset of that group. IMC> A bare public key that you will only trust if you trust a public key IMC> that has signed it is not a public key: it is a part of a IMC> certificate. DNSSEC "keys" are in fact not keys, they are a part of a IMC> certificate. I'll agree with that definition. (I also neglected to take into account the SIG overhead in my previous message) ] ON HUMILITY: to err is human. To moo, bovine. | firewalls [ ] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works, Ottawa, ON |net architect[ ] mcr@sandelman.ottawa.on.ca http://www.sandelman.ottawa.on.ca/ |device driver[ ] panic("Just another NetBSD/notebook using, kernel hacking, security guy"); [ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.3ia Charset: latin1 Comment: Finger me for keys iQCVAwUBPDszFoqHRg3pndX9AQFmLgP/fdrap48rgflE+Wjf3/FmRZuN8aifOJUG I1cdHSl0VBWUq+wSaKjhx7+Uy0A9+nUyj+UWOfkmPziNrSwC9NQLBZmOeImnbkpV YIBm1AH0Gbm2jNQUPakYVvadXJ2j2Y7weVhBS1J5Wj+TAObkhNr9u/7UXor8KXXT 5Cs3zKXPJoA= =270Z -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----