To:
EPP Provreg <ietf-provreg@cafax.se>
From:
Theo Kramer <theo@flame.co.za>
Date:
Tue, 14 Sep 2010 08:16:08 +0200
In-Reply-To:
<014f01cb53c8$d4690c90$7d3b25b0$@afilias.info>
Sender:
owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Subject:
Re: [ietf-provreg] secDNS-1.1: use of only one form of interface
On 14 Sep 2010, at 06:53AM, Michael Young wrote: > I'll keep my comments simple, Chris has a very valid point, there are other > examples of what he's referring to, .ZA comes to mind for instance. Oops - hit the wrong button first time around. However, we will probably have each .za 2LD as a separate registry implementation albeit within a shared centralized infrastructure. This allowing clear separation of policy. -- Regards Theo -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- List run by majordomo software. For (Un-)subscription and similar details send "help" to ietf-provreg-request@cafax.se