[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


To: "Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com>
CC: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@shinkuro.com>, EPP Provreg <ietf-provreg@cafax.se>
From: Klaus Malorny <Klaus.Malorny@knipp.de>
Date: Wed, 04 Nov 2009 21:33:30 +0100
In-Reply-To: <046F43A8D79C794FA4733814869CDF0702ECE0B9@dul1wnexmb01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com>
Sender: owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686 (x86_64); en-US; rv:1.9.1.6pre) Gecko/20091104 Shredder/3.0pre
Subject: Re: [ietf-provreg] Anyone working on 4310-bis?

On 04/11/09 21:05, Hollenbeck, Scott wrote:

> Section 2 of 5730 very clearly states that "Commands are processed by a
> server in the order they are received from a client."  If an<add>  is
> received before a<rem>  it should be processed first.
>
> Scott
>

Hi Scott,

up to now I interpreted the term "command" in this sentence in respect to the 
"epp:commandType" in the "urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:epp-1.0" name space as an 
atomic piece of work. The definition as low level sequences of characters 
forming text contents, attributes, elements, comments, processing instructions 
and so on, representing individual tiny commands within the big one, is a fairly 
new and dubious concept to me, especially as the XML infoset[1] does not regard 
the order of attributes in the document as relevant and parsers and generators 
are free to change it.

But thanks for clarification.

Regards,

Klaus


[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/xml-infoset Appendix D, 10.
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
List run by majordomo software.  For (Un-)subscription and similar details
send "help" to ietf-provreg-request@cafax.se


Home | Date list | Subject list