Re: [ietf-provreg] Anyone working on 4310-bis?

[Howard Eland <heland@afilias.info>]

This is what I was saying.  The digest is unique (specially when we're  
talking across only the same keytag), so the rest of the information  
is superfluous.

-Howard

On Oct 29, 2009, at 10:32 AM, Andrew Sullivan wrote:

> On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 10:32:19AM -0400, James Gould wrote:
>
>> still behaves like a replace, which again is backward compatible.   
>> The only
>> difference is that all four elements need to be provided (keyTag,  
>> alg,
>> digestType, digest) with a rem, which I donšt believe should be a  
>> big issue.
>> Does anyone see an issue with having to specify either the keyTag  
>> or all
>> four elements on a rem?
>
> Can you say why you prefer to use all four elements instead of just
> the digest?  The digest actually is unique, so adding the other
> elements doesn't make it easier, I don't think, does it?
>
> A
>
>
> -- 
> Andrew Sullivan
> ajs@shinkuro.com
> Shinkuro, Inc.
> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- 
> =-=-=-
> List run by majordomo software.  For (Un-)subscription and similar  
> details
> send "help" to ietf-provreg-request@cafax.se
>


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
List run by majordomo software.  For (Un-)subscription and similar details
send "help" to ietf-provreg-request@cafax.se