To:
"Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com>, <lisa@osafoundation.org>, <chris.newman@sun.com>
Cc:
<ietf-provreg@cafax.se>, <iesg@ietf.org>
From:
"Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com>
Date:
Fri, 10 Oct 2008 08:34:41 -0400
Content-class:
urn:content-classes:message
In-Reply-To:
<046F43A8D79C794FA4733814869CDF0702651CB6@dul1wnexmb01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com>
Sender:
owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Thread-Index:
AcknsQ62yIPL9cKMTKWbJZbqDV3XqwDI10fg
Thread-Topic:
Standards Track Advancement Request for EPP RFCs
Subject:
[ietf-provreg] RE: Standards Track Advancement Request for EPP RFCs
Could someone from the IESG please ack receipt of the message below? -Scott- > -----Original Message----- > From: Hollenbeck, Scott > Sent: Monday, October 06, 2008 8:43 AM > To: lisa@osafoundation.org; chris.newman@sun.com > Cc: ietf-provreg@cafax.se; iesg@ietf.org; Hollenbeck, Scott > Subject: Standards Track Advancement Request for EPP RFCs > > The EPP RFC documents (RFCs 4930, 4931, 4932, 4933, and 4934) > were published as Draft Standards in May 2007. I am asking > the IESG to review these documents for advancement to > "Standard" status as described in sections 6.1 and 6.2 of RFC > 2026. There are no entries in the RFC Editor errata database > for any of these RFCs. > > Thank you, > Scott Hollenbeck