To:
"Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com>, "Lisa Dusseault" <lisa@osafoundation.org>
Cc:
"Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com>, <ietf-provreg@cafax.se>
From:
Ted Hardie <hardie@qualcomm.com>
Date:
Mon, 2 Oct 2006 07:42:22 -0700
In-Reply-To:
<046F43A8D79C794FA4733814869CDF0701801AB2@dul1wnexmb01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com>
Sender:
owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Subject:
[ietf-provreg] Re: IESG Review Request: EPP to Draft
At 12:34 PM -0400 9/25/06, Hollenbeck, Scott wrote: >Ted, Lisa: > >With recent Internet-Draft document updates and posting of an >implementation report I believe that all of the RFC 2026 >proposed-to-draft milestones that can be met by the former provreg >working group have been met. I would like to ask you to evaluate the >Internet-Draft documents for elevation to Draft Standard status. Here >is a link to the implementation report: > >http://www.ietf.org/IESG/Implementations/RFCs3730-3734_implem.txt I've added the documents below to the tracker, with an intended status of "Draft Standard". I'll review the implementation report and get back to you on a Last Call announcement. As you know, we'll need to call out any of the Proposed Standard references in the Last Call, to avoid downref problems. regards, Ted Hardie >There are some normative references that are still at Proposed Standard >status. Here's a list of the documents and the references in question: > >http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-hollenbeck-epp-rfc3730bis-03.t >xt >RFC 3023 (XML Media Types) >RFC 3339 (Date and Time on the Internet: Timestamps) > >http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-hollenbeck-epp-rfc3731bis-04.t >xt >RFC 3339 (Date and Time on the Internet: Timestamps) > >http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-hollenbeck-epp-rfc3732bis-03.t >xt >RFC 3339 (Date and Time on the Internet: Timestamps) >RFC 3513 (Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) Addressing Architecture) > >http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-hollenbeck-epp-rfc3733bis-04.t >xt >RFC 2822 (Internet Message Format) >RFC 3339 (Date and Time on the Internet: Timestamps) > >http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-hollenbeck-epp-rfc3734bis-03.t >xt >RFC 2246 (The TLS Protocol Version 1.0) > >Each document includes an appendix containing a list of changes from the >relevant RFC. While there were several text changes to clarify portions >of the text as a result of implementation experience, there were no >schema changes needed when updating the documents. The EPP version >specified in the original RFCs and the -bis documents remains the same. > >I'm available to answer any questions. Thank you for your >consideration. > >-Scott-