To:
"Ted Hardie" <hardie@qualcomm.com>, "Lisa Dusseault" <lisa@osafoundation.org>
Cc:
"Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com>, <ietf-provreg@cafax.se>
From:
"Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com>
Date:
Mon, 25 Sep 2006 12:34:59 -0400
Content-class:
urn:content-classes:message
Sender:
owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Thread-Index:
AcbgwIrrMk14ZYQiSma9iV8/vOlJsQ==
Thread-Topic:
IESG Review Request: EPP to Draft
Subject:
[ietf-provreg] IESG Review Request: EPP to Draft
Ted, Lisa: With recent Internet-Draft document updates and posting of an implementation report I believe that all of the RFC 2026 proposed-to-draft milestones that can be met by the former provreg working group have been met. I would like to ask you to evaluate the Internet-Draft documents for elevation to Draft Standard status. Here is a link to the implementation report: http://www.ietf.org/IESG/Implementations/RFCs3730-3734_implem.txt There are some normative references that are still at Proposed Standard status. Here's a list of the documents and the references in question: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-hollenbeck-epp-rfc3730bis-03.t xt RFC 3023 (XML Media Types) RFC 3339 (Date and Time on the Internet: Timestamps) http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-hollenbeck-epp-rfc3731bis-04.t xt RFC 3339 (Date and Time on the Internet: Timestamps) http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-hollenbeck-epp-rfc3732bis-03.t xt RFC 3339 (Date and Time on the Internet: Timestamps) RFC 3513 (Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) Addressing Architecture) http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-hollenbeck-epp-rfc3733bis-04.t xt RFC 2822 (Internet Message Format) RFC 3339 (Date and Time on the Internet: Timestamps) http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-hollenbeck-epp-rfc3734bis-03.t xt RFC 2246 (The TLS Protocol Version 1.0) Each document includes an appendix containing a list of changes from the relevant RFC. While there were several text changes to clarify portions of the text as a result of implementation experience, there were no schema changes needed when updating the documents. The EPP version specified in the original RFCs and the -bis documents remains the same. I'm available to answer any questions. Thank you for your consideration. -Scott-