To:
"Edward Lewis" <Ed.Lewis@Neustar.biz>
Cc:
<ietf-provreg@cafax.se>
From:
"Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com>
Date:
Wed, 26 Oct 2005 11:00:40 -0400
Content-class:
urn:content-classes:message
Sender:
owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Thread-Index:
AcXZqtoIP7ofgoOtR/CLrsCwOZOE3gAkw8zQ
Thread-Topic:
[ietf-provreg] secdns draft
Subject:
RE: [ietf-provreg] secdns draft
> -----Original Message----- > From: Edward Lewis [mailto:Ed.Lewis@neustar.biz] > Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2005 5:27 PM > To: Hollenbeck, Scott > Cc: Edward Lewis; ietf-provreg@cafax.se > Subject: RE: [ietf-provreg] secdns draft > > At 15:41 -0400 10/25/05, Hollenbeck, Scott wrote: > > >Ed, both the dnssec document and the enum document (as > another example) > >*were* described on the provreg list. The list has remained > open partly > >so it could be used as a resource for continued discussion. > > True, the docs do get mention, but having to dig back 3 years through > archives is a bit much. Especially when the digger isn't aware there > is something to find there. I'd agree if those were the only times the documents were mentioned on this list. They're not. -Scott-