To:
"Edward Lewis" <Ed.Lewis@neustar.biz>
Cc:
<ietf-provreg@cafax.se>
From:
"Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com>
Date:
Tue, 25 Oct 2005 15:41:59 -0400
Content-class:
urn:content-classes:message
Sender:
owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Thread-Index:
AcXZlsH6meleDQknTuKqD9ziE/q0JwABA0Ow
Thread-Topic:
[ietf-provreg] secdns draft
Subject:
RE: [ietf-provreg] secdns draft
> -----Original Message----- > From: Edward Lewis [mailto:Ed.Lewis@neustar.biz] > Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2005 3:03 PM > To: Klaus Malorny > Cc: Hollenbeck, Scott; ietf-provreg@cafax.se > Subject: Re: [ietf-provreg] secdns draft > > At 20:45 +0200 10/25/05, Klaus Malorny wrote: > >Hollenbeck, Scott wrote: > >> Klaus, > >> You should really read the mailing list archives of the > dnsop working group. > >> Everything you're asking about was discussed there over > the course of > >> several months before the document was approved by the IESG. > >> -Scott- > >> > > > > > >Hmm, I thought this was the list that discusses EPP issues. > > Somewhere, somehow, there was a request to get the DNS ops experts to > review the extension because 1) the subject matter is DNS and 2) > there weren't any EPP-base-protocol issues raised. > > OTOH, Klaus, I agree that it would be nice if the IETF processes were > more forthcoming in a situation like this. I.e., all extension work > on EPP ought to be at least publicized, well, somewhere. To the > IETF, the PROVREG WG is over and done and this list is kind of in > limbo. (It's not even provided by IETF machine resources.) Ed, both the dnssec document and the enum document (as another example) *were* described on the provreg list. The list has remained open partly so it could be used as a resource for continued discussion. DNSSEC: http://www.cafax.se/ietf-provreg/maillist/2002-03/msg00042.html Jaap had also been forwarding I-D announcements to the list. ENUM: http://www.cafax.se/ietf-provreg/maillist/2001-08/msg00106.html -Scott-