[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


To: Klaus Malorny <Klaus.Malorny@knipp.de>
Cc: "Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com>, ietf-provreg@cafax.se
From: Edward Lewis <Ed.Lewis@neustar.biz>
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2005 12:02:54 -0700
In-Reply-To: <435E7D3A.10200@knipp.de>
Sender: owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Subject: Re: [ietf-provreg] secdns draft

At 20:45 +0200 10/25/05, Klaus Malorny wrote:
>Hollenbeck, Scott wrote:
>>  Klaus,
>>  You should really read the mailing list archives of the dnsop working group.
>>  Everything you're asking about was discussed there over the course of
>>  several months before the document was approved by the IESG.
>>  -Scott-
>>
>
>
>Hmm, I thought this was the list that discusses EPP issues.

Somewhere, somehow, there was a request to get the DNS ops experts to 
review the extension because 1) the subject matter is DNS and 2) 
there weren't any EPP-base-protocol issues raised.

OTOH, Klaus, I agree that it would be nice if the IETF processes were 
more forthcoming in a situation like this.  I.e., all extension work 
on EPP ought to be at least publicized, well, somewhere.  To the 
IETF, the PROVREG WG is over and done and this list is kind of in 
limbo.  (It's not even provided by IETF machine resources.)

-- 
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Edward Lewis                                                +1-571-434-5468
NeuStar

True story:
Only a routing "expert" would fly London->Minneapolis->Dallas->Minneapolis
to get home from a conference.  (Cities changed to protect his identity.)

Home | Date list | Subject list