To:
"'Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine'" <brunner@nic-naa.net>, "'Hollenbeck, Scott'" <shollenbeck@verisign.com>
Cc:
"'Patrick Mevzek'" <provreg@contact.dotandco.com>, <ietf-provreg@cafax.se>
From:
"Michael Young" <myoung@ca.afilias.info>
Date:
Tue, 20 Sep 2005 17:59:48 -0400
In-Reply-To:
<200509201558.j8KFwiEY070956@nic-naa.net>
Sender:
owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Thread-Index:
AcW+LIw0TvNEhnqDRXOwk/e4h8ykDgAAJPyw
Subject:
RE: [ietf-provreg] EPP to Draft: Next Steps
Scott looks like you have a significant group saying don't version - I will defer to the collective given that clearly no one wants the hassle of a version change. Patrick I still think you have a point but it seems like not a strong enough one for this audience. Best Michael Young -----Original Message----- From: owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se [mailto:owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se] On Behalf Of Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2005 11:59 AM To: Hollenbeck, Scott Cc: Patrick Mevzek; ietf-provreg@cafax.se; brunner@nic-naa.net Subject: Re: [ietf-provreg] EPP to Draft: Next Steps > All having a minOccurs=0 attribute means that all are optional. This > is part of the error in 3731. The schema correctly says they don't > need to be there. The text does. The text is wrong. Agree. Schema is normative. > It might indeed cause a problem for a > server written to the old text. A problem only for server(s) written (imprudently) to the (non-normative) text. > My barometer for version change has always been schema change. Agree. Delta text, not version identifier and definitely not schema. Cheers, Eric