To:
ietf-provreg@cafax.se
From:
Andrew Sullivan <andrew@ca.afilias.info>
Date:
Tue, 16 Aug 2005 17:53:56 -0400
Content-Disposition:
inline
In-Reply-To:
<a06200712bf28090beb0d@[10.31.32.63]>
Mail-Followup-To:
Andrew Sullivan <andrew@ca.afilias.info>,ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Reply-To:
Andrew Sullivan <andrew@ca.afilias.info>
Sender:
owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
User-Agent:
Mutt/1.5.9i
Subject:
Re: [ietf-provreg] 3730 <poll> Text Change Proposal
On Tue, Aug 16, 2005 at 05:25:22PM -0400, Edward Lewis wrote:
> not necessary." I.e., the initiator and responder ought to tolerate
> being told of a transfer request, but the other party must be told.
>
> Is that what we are going towards?
I hope not, because I'm trying to make the whole thing optional (if
we don't take the other approach I suggested). My experience of
clients' actual use of the message queue is that many of them simply
don't. I want to make it more useful for them, in the hope that
they'll use it and spare me creating more needless reports.
A
--
----
Andrew Sullivan 204-4141 Yonge Street
Afilias Canada Toronto, Ontario Canada
<andrew@ca.afilias.info> M2P 2A8
+1 416 646 3304 x4110