To:
"Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com>
Cc:
"Edward Lewis" <Ed.Lewis@neustar.biz>, <ietf-provreg@cafax.se>
From:
Edward Lewis <Ed.Lewis@neustar.biz>
Date:
Tue, 19 Jul 2005 14:53:37 -0400
In-Reply-To:
<046F43A8D79C794FA4733814869CDF07B5EB64@dul1wnexmb01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com>
Sender:
owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Subject:
RE: [ietf-provreg] EPP Document Updates
At 14:47 -0400 7/19/05, Hollenbeck, Scott wrote: >If I remember correctly (and it's possible I won't), all of the >"pending" stuff was added as a result of people wanting to allow some >sort of offline review/processing before some "final" state was entered. >I personally think it makes the protocol a little kludgy, but I believe >there was a need to try to match operational realities. I hate it when reality gets in the way of a good protocol. ;) I think you remember correctly though. There was mention of non-near-real-time, off-line component to activities in the WG. -- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Edward Lewis +1-571-434-5468 NeuStar If you knew what I was thinking, you'd understand what I was saying.