To:
"'Bernie Hoeneisen'" <bhoeneis@switch.ch>
Cc:
"'enum@ietf.org'" <enum@ietf.org>, "'ietf-provreg@cafax.se'" <ietf-provreg@cafax.se>
From:
"Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com>
Date:
Tue, 28 Sep 2004 08:18:03 -0400
Sender:
owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Subject:
[ietf-provreg] RE: New I/D: draft-hoeneisen-enum-validation-epp-0 0
> > Well, then perhaps a more basic question: why is the number > needed in the > > extension at all? You already have the domain name; the > number can be > > trivially derived from the name. > > For the major part of the cases I agree with you. > But I am trying to make the extension as generic as possible. > Im can imagine, that certain validation procedures might need this > optional field. I still don't get it. If the number is needed, it can be derived from the domain name. Why carry it twice? The only scenario I can imagine is one in which some kind of formatting or some extra information (such as over-dialing numbers) needs to be preserved. Is that what you have in mind? -Scott-