To:
"Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com>
Cc:
"'IETF Provreg'" <ietf-provreg@cafax.se>
From:
Joe Abley <jabley@isc.org>
Date:
Wed, 7 Apr 2004 11:40:09 -0400
In-Reply-To:
<5BEA6CDB196A4241B8BE129D309AA4AF030DFB50@vsvapostal8.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com>
Sender:
owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Subject:
Re: [ietf-provreg] Unique identifiers for Contact
On 7 Apr 2004, at 06:54, Hollenbeck, Scott wrote: >> The spec seemed fairly clear to me that clients shouldn't expect the >> server-unique string in the response to be the same as the >> server-unique string they suggested, but upon re-reading, it >> does seem >> reasonable to not make that assumption. >> >> Scott: what did you intend, here? > > The id returned in the response is supposed to be the same one that the > client requested to be created with the command. Just like domain and > host > names. So, just to clarify, the intention is for server-unique identifiers to be constructed by clients guessing repeatedly at strings which they think might be unique, until one is found that doesn't collide with an existing identifier on the server? Joe