[ietf-provreg] RE: Grace periods

["Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com>]

Antony,

No, I have no intention of updating the RGP document to include descriptions
of status values that have nothing to do with the RGP.  There may, however,
be some value in defining a new extension that describes some of the
policy-based grace periods that you described below.

But -- there's already a status value to describe what I think you mean when
you say "Transfer grace period".  See the description of the
"pendingTransfer" status in the domain draft.  For that matter, it may make
sense to use the other "pending" status values to describe the add and renew
grace periods, as in "this action has been requested but hasn't yet been
fully completed".  Would that make sense?

-Scott-

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Antony Perkov [mailto:antony.perkov@poptel.coop] 
> Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 6:04 AM
> To: ietf-provreg@cafax.se
> Cc: shollenbeck@verisign.com
> Subject: Grace periods
> 
> 
> Are there any plans to update the 
> draft-hollenbeck-epp-rgp-01.txt document
> to include status values for grace periods other than "redemption"?
> 
> I'm interested in status values for the other grace periods 
> described at
> http://www.dnso.org/dnso/notes/20030323.DeletesTF-final-report
.html which
are:

* Add grace period
* Auto renew grace period
* Renew grace period
* Transfer grace period

It seems to me that it would be useful to be able to provide registrars this
information via the <info> command.