To:
"Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com>
cc:
ietf-provreg@cafax.se
From:
Bernie Hoeneisen <bhoeneis@switch.ch>
Date:
Wed, 2 Jul 2003 17:20:05 +0200 (CEST)
In-Reply-To:
<5BEA6CDB196A4241B8BE129D309AA4AF82B4A3@vsvapostal8.vasrv.verisign.com>
Sender:
owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Subject:
RE: [ietf-provreg] Some EPP questions
Hi Scott! Thanks for your really fast answer. On Wed, 2 Jul 2003, Hollenbeck, Scott wrote: > > Assuming the response to a transfer command is 1001 "Command completed > > successfully; action pending". What would the server answer to a > > transfer query command (assuming nothing concerning this transfer has > > changed at server since the 1001 was sent)? > > There's nothing that should stop a query from being answered completely, so > a 1000 response code is appropriate. Remember that each response code is > related directly to the command it is being sent for and it becomes easier > to remember which code is appropriate. I looks like that I have to refine my original question, as I am more interested in the content of the <trStatus> field in the response to the transfer query command. Or in other words: If the response code to the transfer command was 1000, the <trStatus> element of the response to the following transfer query command contains 'pending' (as in the response to the transfer command itself). But what does the <trStatus> contain in the response to the transfer query command, if the response code to the transfer command itself was 1001? And one further question, what does the <trStatus> contain in the response to the transfer command itself, if its response code is 1001? cheers, Bernie