[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


To: "Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com>
Cc: "'Edward Lewis'" <edlewis@arin.net>, "Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com>, "'ietf-provreg@cafax.se'" <ietf-provreg@cafax.se>
From: Edward Lewis <edlewis@arin.net>
Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2003 11:49:28 -0400
In-Reply-To: <5BEA6CDB196A4241B8BE129D309AA4AF10E6D9@vsvapostal8>
Sender: owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Subject: RE: [ietf-provreg] Proposed Text for Contact Mapping Disclosure E lements

Generic 'ok', 'cept for:

At 11:32 -0400 4/21/03, Hollenbeck, Scott wrote:
>If you're not, you don't.  So do I need to add a sentence in the <info>
>description that describes the primacy of authorization?

Given (my) experience with other IETF specs, yeah.

>What impact, other than in a <create>?  The description of the <create>
>command will be modified to describe how the information can be set
>initially.  This change is what I meant by my "consistency" statement at the
>end of the proposal.

The other's are answered by other comments (primacy of authorization).

-- 
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Edward Lewis                                            +1-703-227-9854
ARIN Research Engineer

"I'm sorry, sir, your flight is delayed for maintenance.  We are
pounding out the dents from the last landing."

Home | Date list | Subject list