To:
Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine <brunner@nic-naa.net>
Cc:
Edward Lewis <edlewis@arin.net>, Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine <brunner@nic-naa.net>, Ted Hardie <hardie@qualcomm.com>, ietf-provreg@cafax.se
From:
Edward Lewis <edlewis@arin.net>
Date:
Fri, 18 Apr 2003 10:57:29 -0400
In-Reply-To:
<200304181440.h3IEenZj011315@nic-naa.net>
Sender:
owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Subject:
Re: [ietf-provreg] legal entity vs individual person
At 10:40 -0400 4/18/03, Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine wrote: Ah. >I want "business privacy" NOT AT ALL, but if it must exist (same modulo >as above), as a DISTINCT part of the core, or as a DISTINCT extension. > >I don't want "it". If "it" exists, I want "it" to come in separate units >of syntax (or a three valued type, as Andrew suggested, which has the >same semantic result). Okay, let's get some group comment on Andy's suggestion. Calendar note: today is a holiday for quite a few, so I'll be patient... >Now the IETF fiat (or mazda) is that <mumble> be in the core. I suppose Interesting. Andy and I both drive Mazdas. My plates are IP6ARPA. Really. ;) -- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Edward Lewis +1-703-227-9854 ARIN Research Engineer "I'm sorry, sir, your flight is delayed for maintenance. We are pounding out the dents from the last landing."