To:
ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Cc:
anewton@ecotroph.net
From:
Ed Allen Smith <easmith@beatrice.rutgers.edu>
Date:
Thu, 17 Apr 2003 18:43:50 -0400
In-Reply-To:
<3E9F1D54.50608@ecotroph.net>
Sender:
owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Subject:
Re: [ietf-provreg] legal entity vs individual person
In message <3E9F1D54.50608@ecotroph.net> (on 17 April 2003 17:32:04 -0400), anewton@ecotroph.net (Andrew Newton) wrote: >Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine wrote: >> >> please check one box, within the scope of a client-side <dnp> oerator, >> >> [] there is no such thing as "personal data" semantics >> [] there is such a thing as "personal data"semantics >> >> That is what is the present issue, get consensus on it, and there is >> nothing left in it to consider. > >Would the following work for you? > >Instead of flag being true or false, it is an enumerated type with the >following allowable values: > ok to disclose > do not disclose > do not disclose because this is personal data Should attempting to use the last for a DNS server's IP address (at least for IPv4) be considered a syntax error? And what's the default state (I suggest _one_ of the above be the default for _all_, to remove disputes over "should this default on or off" and people _forgetting_ in programming, etcetera whether things default on or off...)? -Allen -- Allen Smith http://cesario.rutgers.edu/easmith/ February 1, 2003 Space Shuttle Columbia Ad Astra Per Aspera To The Stars Through Asperity