To:
Edward Lewis <edlewis@arin.net>
Cc:
"Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com>, "'ietf-provreg@cafax.se'" <ietf-provreg@cafax.se>
From:
Joe Abley <jabley@isc.org>
Date:
Thu, 10 Apr 2003 17:26:16 -0400
In-Reply-To:
<a05111b06babb8d682bd7@[192.149.252.108]>
Sender:
owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Subject:
Re: [ietf-provreg] References for Today's Host Object Discussion
On Thursday, Apr 10, 2003, at 17:17 Canada/Eastern, Edward Lewis wrote: > Would excluding MX's (et.al.) be too shortsighted for our > extensibility (E of EPP)? If we can add them using extensions, I would say that is plenty of support. > Would only considering NS's and glue be sufficient for EPP 1.0? I would say yes. [My previous comment was really just a clarification of what it was I was talking about, and not any kind of opinion that RRs other than NS and glue should be supported in the base set of documents.] Joe