RE: [ietf-provreg] the privacy problem statement

["Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com>]

> I dont think a privacy profile for contact objects only is 
> much useful...
> 
> The most prominent example is that a registry might mandate 
> that the Admin
> contact Address be displayed while other contacts may have 
> them hidden.  If
> a contact is the Admin contact of one domain and a billing contact for
> another, and the contact object was created when s/he needed 
> to be an Admin
> contact, then s/he will be forced to also disclose his/her 
> address for the
> other domains that s/he is associated with.
> 
> I think privacy profile for domain mapping is as important... 
> if not more
> important

I'm not talking about privacy profiles.  My regurgitated proposal was
limited to the simple mechanism required to get the documents past the IESG.
Additional privacy syntax and semantics can (and should) be addressed in an
extension.

-Scott-