[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine <brunner@nic-naa.net>
cc: "Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com>, "'Edward Lewis'" <edlewis@arin.net>, <ietf-provreg@cafax.se>, <jaap@sidn.nl>
From: Rick Wesson <wessorh@ar.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2003 08:23:22 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <200303171616.h2HGGVGL011870@nic-naa.net>
Sender: owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Subject: Re: [ietf-provreg] thursday's meeting

On Mon, 17 Mar 2003, Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine wrote:

> > >     Our response to the IESG.  The IESG wants "a standard (as
> > > in the base,
> > >     core spec) means for a registrar to tell a registry what
> > > can be disclosed
> > >     at fine granularity."


> Pointing out a specific defect in the <dcp> element's sub-schema would be
> really useful.

The DCP proposal didn't address how a registrar can tell the registry
what can be disclosed. I believe it was the <dnd> proposal that did
allow this fine granularity of disclosure.


Home | Date list | Subject list