To: Edward Lewis <firstname.lastname@example.org>
cc: Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine <email@example.com>, Andrew Newton <firstname.lastname@example.org>, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org
From: Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine <email@example.com>
Date: Fri, 07 Mar 2003 10:22:47 -0500
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 07 Mar 2003 10:07:57 EST." <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Subject: Re: [ietf-provreg] proto-agenda
> There is the expectation that this WG may stick around until we get > to DS. That means that we may remain active in spite of resolving > the IESG comment, getting PS documents and not spending time on > issues that have flared up and then seemed to go away (ROID). Understood. HTTP WG hung until Moore and Freed screwed around with Dave Krystol's state management mechanism draft. Too similar to the current wrangle for comfort. > In that case, discussing alt. transports at -57 might not be a bad idea. > > However, 1) no one can promise we will still be active then and 2) > starting a discussion on the mail list at any time is preferable for > waiting to start a discussion at an in-face meeting. Of course.