To:
"'Edward Lewis'" <edlewis@arin.net>, ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Cc:
jaap@sidn.nl
From:
"Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com>
Date:
Fri, 7 Mar 2003 07:23:14 -0500
Sender:
owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Subject:
RE: [ietf-provreg] Fwd: Re: provreg milestones
> Also to the group - as far as the privacy thing being resolved, I'm a > bit hesitant to declare consensus yet to the proposal in: > > # From: "Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com> > # Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2003 13:02:34 -0500 > # > # As far as .com is concerned, I have no doubt that an > extension will be > # required even if we were to adopt the IESG's element > tagging suggestion. > # That being the case, my preference would be to put _all_ of > the DNP syntax > # and semantics into an extension (where the problem can be > addressed as a > # whole) while making the existing DCP element mandatory if > that resolves the > # privacy issue with the IESG. > > (Aka - > http://www.cafax.se/ietf-provreg/maillist/2003-03/msg00010.html) > > So let me hear about that... Ed, please note these supporting comments sent prior to your note: http://www.cafax.se/ietf-provreg/maillist/2003-03/msg00015.html http://www.cafax.se/ietf-provreg/maillist/2003-03/msg00023.html -Scott-