[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


To: "'Edward Lewis'" <edlewis@arin.net>
Cc: "'ietf-provreg@cafax.se'" <ietf-provreg@cafax.se>
From: "Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2003 12:40:24 -0500
Sender: owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Subject: RE: [ietf-provreg] FYI: EPP implementation by the Polish registry

> At 10:47 -0500 3/3/03, Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine wrote:
> >adding attributes to elements is either pervasive, or 
> specific. As this
> >WG lost the technical/social distinction with the expiry of 
> Ross' draft,
> 
> What parts of the material in Ross' draft need to be added (as 
> terminology definitions) in the base spec (or base spec-bis)?

Note that section 1.1 of requirements RFC 3375 includes parenthetical
descriptions for "social" and "technical" information in the definition of a
"thick" registry.

-Scott-

Home | Date list | Subject list