To:
"'Edward Lewis'" <edlewis@arin.net>
Cc:
"'ietf-provreg@cafax.se'" <ietf-provreg@cafax.se>
From:
"Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com>
Date:
Thu, 6 Mar 2003 12:40:24 -0500
Sender:
owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Subject:
RE: [ietf-provreg] FYI: EPP implementation by the Polish registry
> At 10:47 -0500 3/3/03, Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine wrote: > >adding attributes to elements is either pervasive, or > specific. As this > >WG lost the technical/social distinction with the expiry of > Ross' draft, > > What parts of the material in Ross' draft need to be added (as > terminology definitions) in the base spec (or base spec-bis)? Note that section 1.1 of requirements RFC 3375 includes parenthetical descriptions for "social" and "technical" information in the definition of a "thick" registry. -Scott-