To:
"'Ross Wm. Rader'" <ross@tucows.com>, "'Hollenbeck, Scott'" <shollenbeck@verisign.com>, "'Edward Lewis'" <edlewis@arin.net>, <ietf-provreg@cafax.se>
From:
"Michael Young" <myoung@libertyrms.info>
Date:
Mon, 3 Mar 2003 15:10:10 -0500
Importance:
Normal
In-Reply-To:
<533274406.1046699428@[10.0.11.248]>
Sender:
owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Subject:
RE: [ietf-provreg] FYI: EPP implementation by the Polish registry
Likewise, we are also happy with that approach.
Michael Young
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se [mailto:owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se]
On Behalf Of Ross Wm. Rader
Sent: March 3, 2003 1:50 PM
To: Hollenbeck, Scott; 'Edward Lewis'; 'ietf-provreg@cafax.se'
Subject: RE: [ietf-provreg] FYI: EPP implementation by the Polish
registry
--On Monday, March 03, 2003 1:02 PM -0500 "Hollenbeck, Scott"
<shollenbeck@verisign.com> mentioned that:
> That being the case, my preference would be to put _all_ of the DNP
> syntax and semantics into an extension (where the problem can be
> addressed as a
> whole) while making the existing DCP element mandatory
We'd be happy with that as well.
regards,
-rwr
"There's a fine line between fishing and standing on the shore like an
idiot."
- Steven Wright
Get Blog... http://www.byte.org/