To:
"Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com>
Cc:
"'Edward Lewis'" <edlewis@arin.net>, ietf-provreg@cafax.se
From:
Edward Lewis <edlewis@arin.net>
Date:
Tue, 21 Jan 2003 11:36:52 -0500
In-Reply-To:
<3CD14E451751BD42BA48AAA50B07BAD603370550@vsvapostal3.prod.netsol.com>
Sender:
owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Subject:
RE: [ietf-provreg] where are we with privacy
At 8:49 -0500 1/20/03, Hollenbeck, Scott wrote: > >What would you suggest as a way forward? > This is the third try at answering this. The other attempts got lengthy and pointless. I would like to see a better case made for the granular privacy data specification. The IESG wants it, but the group is not sold that this is possible (= worth achieving with the given level of effort available). I would also like others to comment on Jaap's message and assessment that: At 13:43 +0100 1/10/03, Jaap Akkerhuis wrote: ... >So yes, the non-disclose attribute will work for us without any >problem. It is possible that we might do extensions to aid with the ... > > jaap I do see that there are some other messages I haven't read yet in the mailbox...I've taken too long thinking about this one, I guess. -- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Edward Lewis +1-703-227-9854 ARIN Research Engineer