To:
"'Klaus Malorny'" <Klaus.Malorny@knipp.de>
Cc:
ietf-provreg@cafax.se
From:
"Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com>
Date:
Sat, 7 Dec 2002 11:32:39 -0500
Sender:
owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Subject:
RE: lastVerified: optional vs. extension
> Well, at the moment I don't know which proposal you are referring to, > but let me say that external hosts were never a problem to me. The > problem I had and still have are the in-zone hosts - who is > allowed to > create them and under which conditions they are used for the > creation of > glue records. I explained more than once to you that your > model does not > have the high level of security/reliability you claim. I got the > impression that it wasn't a communication problem that you did not > understand me, but that you just *didn't want* to understand > me. I have > to admit that this really hurt me somewhere. I (and again, others -- check the archives) continue to disagree with your assertions of model deficiency, and when we pointed out the issues with _your_ model (like the bulk update problem) you typically failed to respond. That's not a sign of not trying to understand -- if anything, it's a clear sign of trying to explore all of the issues in necessary detail. I don't think I ever came across as rude or disinterested, and I stand by the fact that several of your comments were incorporated into the drafts as evidence of acceptance of your ideas. -Scott-