To:
"'Edward Lewis'" <edlewis@arin.net>, ietf-provreg@cafax.se
From:
"Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com>
Date:
Sun, 27 Oct 2002 20:13:45 -0500
Sender:
owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Subject:
RE: Guidelines doc
> This document seems to border on being a guideline vs. a > requirement document. It's supposed to be a guidelines document. Are you saying that it reads more like a requirements document? If so, I could probably rephrase the way the 2119 directives are used to make the focus more clear. > Section 2.1 > > Besides an extension being "informational" it can also be > "experimental." Sure, good point. > Section 2.3 > > Allowing a server to deny to a client access to an extension probably > should migrate to the base spec. Would this impact the state diagram? I don't think so as it's all part of the <login> authentication/authorization process. -Scott-