To:
"Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com>
cc:
"'Ram Mohan'" <rmohan@afilias.info>, <ietf-provreg@cafax.se>
From:
Rick Wesson <wessorh@ar.com>
Date:
Fri, 18 Oct 2002 09:27:07 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To:
<3CD14E451751BD42BA48AAA50B07BAD603370081@vsvapostal3.prod.netsol.com>
Sender:
owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Subject:
RE: Conformance with ICANN Redemption Grace Periods
Scott, I would be happy to see your proposal. thanks for offering! -rick On Fri, 18 Oct 2002, Hollenbeck, Scott wrote: > > My understanding was that if we have to add a new status > > value for a domain > > object it cannot be done > > within the EPP extension framework -- don't the EPP spec and > > xml schema > > definition have to be > > modified ? > > No, that's what extensions are all about: adding new elements, constructs, > and procedures for specialized processing without having to modify the core > schemas. > > I'll gladly provide a strawman extension schema for you and Rick if you'd > like to consider it for any proposal you might develop. > > -Scott- >