To:
"Rick Wesson" <wessorh@ar.com>, "Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com>
Cc:
<ietf-provreg@cafax.se>
From:
"Ram Mohan" <rmohan@afilias.info>
Date:
Fri, 18 Oct 2002 10:35:27 -0400
Sender:
owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Subject:
Re: Conformance with ICANN Redemption Grace Periods
rick, i'll take you up on this -- and communicate off-list -ram ----- Original Message ----- From: "Rick Wesson" <wessorh@ar.com> To: "Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com> Cc: "'Ram Mohan'" <rmohan@afilias.info>; <ietf-provreg@cafax.se> Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2002 6:28 PM Subject: RE: Conformance with ICANN Redemption Grace Periods > > > On Thu, 17 Oct 2002, Hollenbeck, Scott wrote: > > > Protocol extension if needed for ICANN registries. It's certainly not a > > general-purpose feature that should be added to the core protocol. > > yes, maybe an extention in the renew command would be appropiate. > > ram, we could develop a proposal... > > > -rick >