RE: dcp expiry element

["Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com>]

> the <greeting> example in the EPP-drafts (06/04 and 07/05) does not 
> include the <expiry>-element of the <dcp>-element. It might be 
> worthwhile having an <expiry>-element in the example.

That element is OPTIONAL.  It might be worthwhile to include it in an
example, but it also might be worthwhile to leave it out to demonstrate that
it _is_ optional.

> I just want to confirm that the following two examples are both valid 
> <dcp>-elements:
> 
>      <dcp>
>        <access><all/></access>
>        <statement>
>          <purpose><admin/><prov/></purpose>
>          <recipient><ours/><public/></recipient>
>          <retention><stated/></retention>
>        </statement>
>        <expiry>
>          <absolute>2004-01-19T22:00:00.0Z</absolute>
>        </expiry>
>      </dcp>
> 
>      <dcp>
>        <access><all/></access>
>        <statement>
>          <purpose><admin/><prov/></purpose>
>          <recipient><ours/><public/></recipient>
>          <retention><stated/></retention>
>        </statement>
>        <expiry>
>          <relative>P1Y2M3DT10H30M10S</relative>
>        </expiry>
>      </dcp>

Both are syntactically valid.  Just run 'em through a validating parser to
confirm.

-Scott-